Daniel Revisited book review

Daniel Revisited by Mark Davidson

This writer has done some good research, but he is making some

bad mistakes.

Legio X that destroyed Jerusalem and The Temple were Syrian

and Arab, Titus gave remarks identifying them as such.

Hubal was the god of the Quraish, H'bal was how baal was said,

and allah is basically “the god” meaning whatever god you were

talking about so hubal was allah of Quraish and of the Kaaba, the

main one there, and appeared as a man. So did “gabriel” who

acted like a demon. Islam is repackaged baal worship.

The people of the ruler to come would then be Syrian specific

or Arab in general. However, might be an Arab who had Jewish

ancestry of the tribe of Dan, born in Rome with Roman

citizenship from an unchaste nun and the Arab or Syrian man,

and himself technically islamic or even Christian, in theory, a

nominal, who becomes a regional ruler in the northen segment

of the last empire, and rises to power in that empire, displacing

other rulers or annexing their regions.

Islamic Antichrist errs in assuming that the statue dream is from

the perspective of Babylon, and Rome in having power over

Babylon even part of the time conquered it, and the wording

doesn't require the kind of total conquest the writer ascribes,

and Rome did conquer Ctesiphon at least once.

It is unreasonable that Rome, which ruled over Judea, would not

be in prophecy, and it is in its day that the eternal kingdom is

set up Christ's first coming, not in the days of Islam.

The first horseman who conquers is probably Islam, and/or the

Turks.

That the ram vision has to do with Antiochus Epiphanius does

not rule out it being end times also, that the former was a

prefiguring and will play out again, because Antiochus did

fulfill all these points or most of them.

One of the biggest weaknesses of this writer is that he ignores

the Scriptures which SAY THAT THE RAM AND GOAT

ARE ABOUT THE MEDO PERSIAN EMPIRE AND THE

GREEKS. No end time relevance.

The deep leafy green implication of chloros of the “pale” horse

being the islamic green, might be legitimate, and the fourth

of the world equating to islamic held turf looks like a fit, so

some of this may be islamic persecution of Christians and Jews